Photo Courtesy of:http://3.bp.blogspot.com/
Well, in light of my recent
presentation, I figured I would write my blog about the concept of “lastness,”
and what it means to be “the last man.” In Lovell Beddoes’s version of “The
Last Man,” he describes the narrator being stuck in what I would call purgatory,
a place between heaven and hell where one religiously gets situated due to
their inability to make penance on their transgressions. In pursuit of the
title of “the last man,” the narrator attempts to outwit death, which Lovell
Beddoes makes apparent through his personification of death in lines such as, “
old Death/ Shall dream he has slain me, and I’ll creep behind him,/ Thrust off
the bony tyrant from his throne/ And beat him into dust.” By personifying
death, Lovell Beddoes wants readers to understand the lengths at which the
narrator will go to obtain the title of the last man, but in his avid pursuit
of “lastness” he commits the sin of suicide, and only becomes the last man as
the reincarnate of the devil.
In contrast to Lovell Beddoes’s version, Thomas Campbell’s version of “The
Last Man” depicts the narrator as the last remaining person on earth after an
apocalyptic event, and instead of personifying death; Campbell personifies
nature especially the sun to characterize the narrator as a religious spirit.
The narrator speaks to the sun, or the “son” of Christ exclaiming that “ALL
worldly shapes shall melt in gloom, The Sun himself must die, /Before this
mortal shall assume/ Its immortality!” This quote speaks to the religious
implications of the poem, in accordance with religious scripture, the son of
Christ must die in order for everyone to ascend into heaven and share in
immortal life after death. The narrator stands “prophet-like, that lone one
stood/With dauntless words and high” saying to the sun “We are twins in death,
proud Sun, / Thy face is cold, thy race is run,/ Tis Mercy bids thee go./ For
thou ten thousand thousand years/ Hast seen the tide of human tears,/That shall
no longer flow.” The narrator’s profession to the sun speaks to the pride and
self-fulfillment he feels from outlasting the rest of his race, thus building
up the glory and/or entitlement that comes from being the last of something.
Lastly, Thomas Hood’s version of
“The Last Man” discredits and/or “spoofs” the aforementioned poems idea of the
last man and lastness in general. The poem depicts a hangman and a peasant who
are the two sole surivors of yet another apocalyptic event. In dire need to be
“the last man” the hangman hangs the peasant, but instead of finding happiness
and eternal glory from being the last man standing, the hangman finds himself
lonely and racked with guilt. The narrator, suffering from “terminal lastness,”
discredits the other two poets and the positive connotation they associate with
the last man, instead through the suffering of the narrator in Hood’s poem, one
can now see the ridiculousness surrounding the idea of lastness and can find
humor in the lengths the aforementioned narrators would go to assume this
position. If you’re the last person, there’s no one left to even award you
recognition and/or acknowledgement for your ability to outlast everyone else.
Also, just because something, or someone is last doesn’t make them the best. By
unearthing the humor and.or ridiculousness surrounding the idea of “lastness”
Thomas Hood works to disparage a literary/poetic theme that has continued to
make headway even in contemporary times, such as in the 2007 feature film, “I
Am Legend,” starring Will Smith. This
movie depicts Smith as legendary for being the last remaining survivor of yet
another apocalyptic and cataclysmic event. What is our society’s obsession with
“lastness”? And, why do we continue to perpetuate this idea by attributing
glory and eternal pride to those who manage to outlast others?
I believe that society's obsession with lastness is probably rooted in our obsession with stregnth. For example, if someone is the "last one standing" in a boxing ring, than that automatically means that they were stronger than their component. There is a sort of finesse about being last -- it means that you were able to pull together your resources in order to live, and that by doing so you outsmarted everyone else.
ReplyDeleteAs for the aspect of loneliness, I believe this could be a sort of punishment for adopting the "live and let die" attitude that so many people espouse. If you survive the end of the world without helping anyone else, that suggests that you most likely took advantage of some people along the way.
Lastly, the idea that there is no one left to congratulate him harps on every man's central point of pride. What is the point of being the best if there is no one to admire you for it? This raises the question of WHY we strive to succeed -- for the attention, or for the personal satisfaction? It is true, then, in this instnace, that life is worthless unless you share it with others.
Great work Jill! I find it interesting that there seems to be three representations occurring: Hell (Hood), purgatory (Beddoes), and heaven (Campbell). I love how the speaker in Beddoes wants to "beat (Death) into dust", because this could imply multiple things: perhaps, he is destroying death, or maybe he is turning death into a human (and thus dust). Overall, I think Campbell is the only one to branch out and take a more stoic look at the scene, but I think his is far too rosy and religious to reach the deeper level of understanding that could otherwise arise. Both Hood and Beddoes, purposely or not, demonize the idea of lastness, and in a way, all three poets critique the typical perception of humanity and lastness. By this, I mean that the speakers in Hood and Beddoes do not find glory in their state as the last man, and in Campbell's, the last man decries the current world anyway and finds death and mortality as useless in the face of God. It would be an interesting (if cruel) satire for a man to really achieve the self-righteous glory these men seek, only to be ridiculed by circumstances of loneliness and peril.
ReplyDelete