In response to Dr. T’s
suggestion and recommendations from my friends, I went to see the Ohio State
Theatre Department’s production of Marat/Sade.
When I walked into the theater, I did not think that there was going to be any
music in the play, but later realized it is a play with music rather than a musical.
Interestingly, there are twelve tracks on the Marat/Sade professionally recorded album, so music definitely
features heavily. The setting of the play is within a mental asylum in the
1808, where the inmates are putting on their own play as a form of artistic
therapy. Because of this, the musical performances are not meant to sound
professional at all, or at least, that is how the Ohio State production chose
to interpret them. As a performer myself, I had never seen musically
intentionally treated this way, so I was immediately intrigued by the reasoning
behind their presentation. By the end of Marat/Sade,
I had decided that even though the musical performances were atypical and
didn’t advance the storyline of the play within the play, they did provide
characterization to the inmates that led to a much less surprising ending and
greater understanding of the inmates in general.
All
of the songs are featured in the play that the inmates are performing, as opposed
to the frame story of the inmates and patrons, so the actors are interestingly
performing them as actors, creating a haunting layering effect. Whether or not
these actors are actually great musicians was irrelevant since their characters
were not. In other words, they were going out of their way to sound extremely
unprofessional, and in some instances, downright bad. Danielle Wisti’s
character, Corday, was meant to be a somewhat proficient singer, so it was
really only in her performances that any proper singing technique could be
observed at all. It was consistent with her character, though, as melancholia
seemed to be her primary affliction, rather than some of the more energized
inmates at the asylum. I thought what was so interesting is that these
hackneyed musical performances added to the overall creepiness of the play. While
a beautiful musical performance is often appreciated, this form of performance
can be just as meaningful if given the proper setting.
The
characters in the asylum were being forced into a mold (the play) that they
were not suited for, and their inappropriateness as well as a longing for
freedom was portrayed through these musical performances. Just as the
characters were forced into a situation that was largely unnatural for them,
the songs featured through the play within the play usually seemed out of place
as well. With musicals, the songs usually add to the storyline or advance the
plot in some way, but these songs seemed almost tacked on as an afterthought.
They were a break in action that often ended up adding more to the frame story
than the play within the play.
The
singers and musicians were unnatural sounding, just as many of their actions
were throughout the play. The inmates of the asylum seemed to revel in the freedom
they were able to experience through artistic expression and usually took it
much farther than other, more professional performers would. The intensity
behind their highly censored acts, as censored by the guards and patrons,
betrayed their longing to express their true natures. When, in the final act,
the inmates of the asylum riot, causing a series of rapes and deaths, their
outburst is not overly surprising. Their actions as well as their musical
performances throughout the play had portrayed them as characters whose true
natures were being violently repressed, so it seemed only natural that they
burst at some point.
Jeni,
ReplyDeleteI think your idea about the musical performance mirroring the dramatic situation is really perceptive and right on target. The approach to the music and the creepiness are to some extent Peter Weiss' adaptation of the techniques of Bertolt Brecht's dramas, with the tinny, clangy music and what Brecht called the deliberate "alienation effect."