The Flying Buttresses of Notre Dame by gselmes
When The Monk, by Matthew Lewis, was initially
published in 1796, the lewd nature of the novel and its risqué themes made it
extremely controversial. An extension of the already burgeoning gothic
tradition, The Monk took many themes present in other Gothic works and
darkened them, often presenting the worst possible outcome of nearly every
scenario. Emma McEvoy states in her introduction to The Monk that, “The
battleground on which most of the controversy about The Monk arose was
the issue of its morality. A novel had not only to please, but also to
instruct” (Lewis vii). Comparing Lewis’s Antonia and Ann Radcliffe’s Julia in
her novel, A Sicilian Romance, can illustrate this dark difference
between The Monk and its predecessors.
As
Lewis is a self-proclaimed fan of Radcliffe’s work, it is not surprising to see
some similarities between Radcliffe’s heroine and Antonia (Lewis xxii). Julia
is extremely sheltered by her Marquis father before the events of the novel.
All she knows of the world is what she can see from her castle window. She is
very sheltered, and so, is very innocent as well. However, despite her very
narrow upbringing, she is able to challenge male patriarchy as well as the
power of the church by rejecting her father’s arranged marriage to the Duke and
escaping the clutch of the abate. While this entails many frightening episodes
including a run-in with some very nasty banditti, a murderous father, many
cases of imprisonment and the perceived loss of her beloved, Julia’s story has
an ideal happy ending. She marries her lover Hippolitus, is freed from her tyrannical
father and the Duke, is reunited with her long-lost mother, her sister, and her
brother, and moves away from her once-imprisoning castle with her innocence
still relatively intact (Radcliffe). In A Sicilian Romance, Julia’s
innocence is valued and ends up aiding her.
In
contrast, Lewis’s Antonia has a much darker, tragic ending. Antonia’s innocence
is fiercely protected by her mother, Elvira as she even goes so far as to give
her a censored version of the bible, remarking, “that unrestricted no reading
more improper could be permitted a young Woman [as the bible]” (Lewis 259). Her
innocence is also of great importance in the novel as it is what attracts
Ambrosio to her in the first place. Ambrosio even remarks, “ How enchanting was
the timid innocence of her eyes” (Lewis 242-243). Because of her innocence,
Antonia is unable to perceive Ambrosio as a threat, even as he unabashedly
flirts with her. When he begins to kiss her, she is “startled, alarmed, and
confused at his action” (Lewis 262). Unable to properly defend herself, she
must be saved by her mother. Finally, when Ambrosio rapes Antonia and she loses
her innocence, she is not even allowed to survive. Ambrosio kills her while she
tries to escape. The lure of her innocence is the cause of her demise.
The
bleak contrast between the fates of Julia and Antonia are highlighted by the
stunning similarity of their circumstances. Along with being raised in fairly
similar situations and eventually having their innocence threatened, the
setting of their final acts are eerily similar as well. Julia is temporarily
trapped with her mother in the dungeon of her father’s castle while Antonia is
trapped in the Vault with Ambrosio. Julia and her mother narrowly avoid death
by not eating the poisoned food while Ambrosio ultimately stabs Antonia. One is
able to escape from the confines of her imprisonment and live a fulfilled and
happy life while the other is condemned to die after having endured a very
violent rape.
The
initial similarities and then startling differences between Julia and Antonia
accurately demonstrate what is so different and similar between The Monk
and A Sicilian Romance. Julia’s character had already proved that the
innocent heroine, who is nearly undone by men, is a sympathetic character that
audiences can root for. Perhaps this is why Antonia’s fate is so disturbing in The
Monk. Readers easily sympathize with her and see her likeness in previous
Gothic heroines. However, she does not get the typical happy ending, or rather,
she does not get a happy ending at all. The parallelism and then stark contrast
between the two is particularly unnerving.
Works Cited
Lewis, Matthew. The Monk.
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1796. Print.
Radcliffe, Ann. A Sicilian Romance.
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1790. Print.
I love the point you make in your last few sentences. I think it raises interesting questions about how much of the horror that is produced by gothic novels can be attributed to their intentional engagement with the genre itself. As you mentioned, Lewis was familiar with Radcliffe's work and sought to give it his own twist. Thus, readers of The Monk get a double dose of horror: one from the horrifying events and another from the uncanniness created by the twist. This may also help explain how Austen's gothic parody, Northanger Abbey, produces moments of genuine fear, both in her readers and in avid gothic reader Catherine. Using gothic tropes builds expectations of fear, even when these tropes are later averted.
ReplyDeleteI think you're reading is very accurate, especially keeping in mind the quote that you cited from the introduction that "A novel had not only to please, but also to instruct." In Radcliffe's novel, we don't learn anything from Julia. She is innocent, naive of the world, beautiful, and she gains her happiness in the end. Her innocence is seen as beneficial to her outcome. However, by giving Antonia an unfavorable ending, Lewis instructs his reader to the other effect of innocence. In Antonia's case, her innocence had a damaging and damning effect. If she had not been so sheltered and so innocent, she might have seen through Ambrosio's designs and avoided her rape and death as well as the death of her mother. Lewis uses his heroine to instruct us morally whereas Radcliffe's heroine lacks such depth.
ReplyDelete